tbrozz what you mean with "second vid f*cked around with the clips waaay too much" ?!

tbrozz ?

Just one question Meander [B]HOW'S THAT YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE WHO UNDERSTOOD IT IN THIS WAY ?![/B]

Man how angry are you... no arguing with you anymore ... write to some administrator and ask him :)

LOL! You are the one who must think. That is just what I point "See these never before seen clips to create your own 2 minute teaser and win a Scott Gambler DH 10 frame..." what they have in mind was around 2 minutes. And if you are [B]not[/B] blind after the results you'll realize it. Really is so hard to say "I've miss understand it "? I've spend so much time to think about this, before downloading the files. And man my English is bad, but I get it.

Nice touch. Next time chose live music something with BPM above 100.The evolution is cool but if you gonna make the logos in the end with it, you must have at least 4-5 seconds to see them. Really like a highlight zone on the brake disk and the title with this particles. Just the slow music was a big problem for me - no culmination.

Meander Man why you think the maximum video time must be exact 2:00 ? "Life Cycles is launching to the world September 1st. The most anticipated movie of the year. See these never before seen clips to create your own 2 minute teaser". No words like "exact", "up to 2 minutes". This is an art the limits are in your head no in the rules. And the idea is to [B]impress[/B] and to [B]express[/B], [B]not[/B] to fallow.

- joe-fisher I want to see witch 3 re-cuts you'll pick for the win if it was up to you :)

"allenrotstein (9 hours ago) 2nd place just bought a ton of effects from VideoCopilot.. Fail!" Man that's funny because if the 2nd video have ton of FX what about the 3-th video? I think if the video was bad as you say it is, it will never gonna make it to top 3.

10x man!!! and i understood what you trying to say int the result page :)